Skip to content
Home » What Does It Mean Awaiting Reviewer Selection? The 7 Top Answers

What Does It Mean Awaiting Reviewer Selection? The 7 Top Answers

Are you looking for an answer to the topic “What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection?“? We answer all your questions at the website Ar.taphoamini.com in category: See more updated computer knowledge here. You will find the answer right below.

Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected.A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.It means, your manuscript conforms to the instructions and specifications laid for the given journal. It also means that according to the judgement of the Editor or Associate Editor or Assistant Editor, the manuscript qualifies to be sent for review. Nothing more and nothing less.

What Does It Mean Awaiting Reviewer Selection?
What Does It Mean Awaiting Reviewer Selection?

Table of Contents

How long are Reviewers given to review?

A question often asked by authors, but also important to editors, is how long does it take between submission and publication of an article. This is a hard question to answer, but often peer review is the lengthiest part of this process. Journals usually ask reviewers to complete their reviews within 3-4 weeks.

See also  Jenkins Trigger Multibranch Pipeline From Another Job? The 6 Latest Answer

What does selecting for review mean?

It means, your manuscript conforms to the instructions and specifications laid for the given journal. It also means that according to the judgement of the Editor or Associate Editor or Assistant Editor, the manuscript qualifies to be sent for review. Nothing more and nothing less.


ScholarOne Manuscripts Author Submission Basics

ScholarOne Manuscripts Author Submission Basics
ScholarOne Manuscripts Author Submission Basics

Images related to the topicScholarOne Manuscripts Author Submission Basics

Scholarone Manuscripts Author Submission Basics
Scholarone Manuscripts Author Submission Basics

How much time do reviewers take?

Some journals give reviewers 60 days, others give 40 days, 30 days, or 20 days to review a paper. MDPI journals give only 10 days, but it can be extended if the reviewer needs more time. In my opinion, 10 days might be too short, but 60 days is excessive.

What does awaiting decision mean?

The status, “Awaiting Decision” means that the manuscript is being processed. You’ll see this status at the start and end of the review cycle.

How long do papers stay under review?

In general, peer review can take anywhere between a few weeks to even 6 months. However, if the status does not change even after two months, you can perhaps send a polite inquiry to the Editor requesting a status update.

How long is decision in process?

Most journals normally take 4-8 weeks to review manuscripts. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers and examines the manuscript.

How many reviewers usually see a paper?

Usually a minimum of two reviewers is required for every article, but this can vary from journal to journal. The reviewers will be asked to read and comment on your article. They may also be invited to advise the editor whether your article is suitable for publication in that journal.


See some more details on the topic What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection? here:


Why does the status of my manuscript keep changing from …

The status “awaiting reviewer selection” implies that the editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper. In case of a revised submission, …

+ Read More

Awaiting reviewer selection for more than one month?

That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never …

+ View Here

Awaiting final decision to awaiting reviewer scores? – Political …

SO IT MEANS ONE OF THE REVIEWER HAVE SENT HIS COMMENTS TO AE, AND THEN AE IS AWAITING TO SELECT SECOND REVIEWER? 5 years ago # Helene QUOTE 2 YEA 3 NAY! HI I …

+ View More Here

‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ + ‘Awaiting Editor Decision’?

It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue …

+ View Here

What is the difference between under review and with reviewers?

The status “reviewers assigned” indicates that the reviewers accepted the invitation to review your paper. Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review.

See also  Mmap Invalid Argument? Top Answer Update

What is a review process?

The review process is the procedure where reporting manager or team leader evaluates employees’ accomplishments and progress towards the objective and goals. It happens by comparing achievements with preset expectations and providing feedback to the employees about the same.

Why is peer review taking so long?

This time varies across different journals. Some journals indicate the time from submission to first decision and the time from submission to final decision on their websites. Lengthy peer review times can be indicative of non-availability of appropriate reviewers for a particular manuscript.

How many days does it take to write a review paper?

Normally, a peer review takes me 1 or 2 days, including reading the supporting information. I almost always do it in one sitting, anything from 1 to 5 hours depending on the length of the paper. In my experience, the submission deadline for reviews usually ranges between 3 working days to up to 3 weeks.

What reason do I put to recommend a reviewer for a journal paper?

Your recommended reviewers should be ones who would be interested in your paper and have a good knowledge of the field, so that they can give their unbiased opinion and also suggest efficient ways of improving your paper.


A manuscript’s journey from submission to publication

A manuscript’s journey from submission to publication
A manuscript’s journey from submission to publication

Images related to the topicA manuscript’s journey from submission to publication

A Manuscript'S Journey From Submission To Publication
A Manuscript’S Journey From Submission To Publication

How long do awaiting reviewer scores take?

4 weeks is also the time I’d expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from “Under review” to “Awaiting reviewer scores” – so it just means some reviewers haven’t yet submitted it and the reviews are either due or overdue.

Does decision in process mean rejection?

If the status of your paper has changed to “decision in process” without first changing to “under review”, it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. It does not necessarily imply rejection, so you need not lose hope just yet.

What does awaiting decision mean on planning application?

pending decision means that an application for planning permission or permission in principle has been made or is deemed to have been made and has not been finally disposed of; Sample 1.

What does it mean to be under review?

Definition of under review

: being officially examined The policy is under review.

What does it mean when a case is under review?

A case that is undergoing judicial review, is one in which the Court is reviewing these issues. This process can take anywhere from a few weeks to a few months, depending upon how many cases are submitted to the Court at any given time. Typically, cases are reviewed in the order in which they are received by the Court.

What does submitted review mean?

Related Definitions

Submitted for review means that a rule has been provided to the legislature for review at a regular or special legislative session as provided in section 67-5291, Idaho Code. Sample 1.

See also  Jquery Append Html Into Div? Trust The Answer

How long does the second review take?

Usually, it takes from one to 3 months maximum. However, I’ve never experienced such a long time for the second round. One possibility is that the reviewers were able to handle the original version fast because it was clear that certain parts needed to be revised.

What is the next step after required reviews completed?

Answer: When the status shows “Required reviews completed,” it means that the reviews have come in. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the reviewers were probably already familiar with it, so they could review it within a short time.

What is first post review decision?

Speed/acceptance

From submission to first post-review decision: the average (median) number of days for a manuscript submitted to the journal to receive a first decision if it is sent out for peer review. Based on manuscripts receiving a post-review first decision in the last calendar year.

Do reviewers see the authors?

No, the reviewers remain anonymous. In rare cases, authors have come tous and have said that the reviewer improved their paper so much that they wouldlike them listed as a co-author. Then the editor can approach the reviewer to findout whether they are happy to become known to the authors.


Peer Review Process and Differences in Reviewer Comments in Academic Publishing

Peer Review Process and Differences in Reviewer Comments in Academic Publishing
Peer Review Process and Differences in Reviewer Comments in Academic Publishing

Images related to the topicPeer Review Process and Differences in Reviewer Comments in Academic Publishing

Peer Review Process And Differences In Reviewer Comments In Academic Publishing
Peer Review Process And Differences In Reviewer Comments In Academic Publishing

How are peer reviewers chosen?

To find reviewers, editors commonly look at the references listed in the manuscript. The authors of some of the cited papers often are suitable reviewers. Editors also find reviewers by searching the literature on the topic of the paper.

What do peer reviewers look for?

Reviewers look for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness of the manuscript that can greatly affect the chances of publishing your research. Apart from these, reviewers check for the scientific merits of the manuscript, its methods, and research misconduct (if any).

Related searches to What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection?

  • awaiting reviewer selection scholarone
  • awaiting reviewer selection emerald
  • awaiting reviewer selection r&r
  • awaiting reviewer selection vs awaiting reviewer assignment
  • awaiting reviewer assignment after major revision
  • what does awaiting eic decision means when it occurs immediately after awaiting reviewer selection
  • how long awaiting reviewer selection
  • awaiting reviewer selection means
  • awaiting reviewer selection how long
  • awaiting reviewer selection for long time
  • awaiting reviewer selection desk reject
  • awaiting reviewer selection to awaiting decision
  • what does it mean awaiting reviewer scores
  • awaiting reviewer selection sage

Information related to the topic What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection?

Here are the search results of the thread What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection? from Bing. You can read more if you want.


You have just come across an article on the topic What does it mean awaiting reviewer selection?. If you found this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.